Zorn: Good people on both sides?
I'm perfectly prepared to lose friendships over this election.
To read this issue in your browser, click on the headline above.
Eric Zorn is a former opinion columnist for the Chicago Tribune. Find a longer bio and contact information here. This issue exceeds in size the maximum length for a standard email. To read the entire issue in your browser, click on the headline link above. Paid subscribers receive each Picayune Plus in their email inbox each Tuesday, are part of our civil and productive commenting community and enjoy the sublime satisfaction of supporting this enterprise.
Mid-summer break
I’ll be in vacation mode the next three weeks so posting will be much lighter than usual. Sunday’s news — I will not call it a surprise — that President Joe Biden has chosen to abandon his candidacy for reelection and endorse Vice President Kamala Harris is the contest to succeed him seems to have given a significant boost to dispirited Democrats. It has also and thrown a scare into Republicans, who have been planning to run by criticizing Biden’s mental fitness and performance in office.
I’ve been calling for Biden to step aside ever since the debate disaster and I’m very glad he did the noble, selfless thing. Harris may or may not win in November, but I strongly believe her chances are better than Biden’s, and that there is plenty of time for voters to take their measure of her either way.
I’m very interested in your views. Please post to comments.
Oh, please!
This has been showing up in my social media feeds fairly often lately. I have a strong reaction to it, which I will share. But read it only after you vote below
Me? I recoil at this treacly sentiment for how it trivializes extremely important differences in outlook, turning them into mere reasonable-people-can-differ disagreements on the order of Cubs/Sox or pineapple on pizza, yes or no.
I can get along with people who want to elect a man who seems eager to take away my rights and freedoms along with the rights and freedoms of people I know and love. I can coexist with people who would love to force their religion on others, who have hate in their heart for those not like them, who don’t give a damn about the environment and who are willing to set aside most of the principles they claim to live by to vote for a uniquely toxic aspiring dictator for president.
But I can’t love and respect them. Not if my love and respect has any value whatsoever.
These aren’t quibbles about tax, health care, public safety or education policy, but matters that fundamentally define civic character. I find galling the suggestion that sharp differences in these areas are superficial and even the suggestion that supporters of Donald Trump share my goals but just have a different idea of how to reach them.
When I made this case to a friend, he gently suggested my attitude was similar to the attitudes of those who can never love and respect people with different religious beliefs because their existence is an affront to God. Hasn’t a version of my sentiment been the root of actual warfare through the ages? I didn’t have a good answer for this, other than that there is no violence in my heart, just flabbergasted contempt.
So I’m interested in what you think.
Abe Lincoln vs. Madison Avenue
Most of the obituaries for comedian and actor Bob Newhart, who died at 94 last week, mentioned this classic comedy bit:
They also referenced the famous final scene in the last episode of “Newhart,” in which his character wakes up as the character in his previous sit com:
The entire series finale of “Newhart” is here.
The week’s best visual jokes
In the spirit of summer reruns. I’m posting here some of the best visual jokes from the early days of this feature, which started in late 2021:
Vote for your favorite. I’ll share the winner in Thursday’s main edition.
Usage note: To me, “tweet” has become a generic term for a short post on social media. And I will continue to call the platform Twitter if only to spite Elon Musk:
On this issue and perhaps this issue alone, I am with U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett:
There’s still time to vote in the conventional Tweet of the Week poll!
Thank you for supporting the Picayune Sentinel. To help this publication grow, please consider spreading the word to friends, family, associates, neighbors and agreeable strangers.
Contact
You can email me here:
I read all the messages that come in, but I do most of my interacting with readers in the comments section beneath each issue.
Some of those letters I reprint and respond to in the Z-mail section of Tuesday’s Picayune Plus, which is delivered to paid subscribers and available to all readers later Tuesday. Check there for responses.
If you don’t want me to use the full name on your email or your comments, let me know how you’d like to be identified.
I do love and respect AND vehemently disagree with my dad—for the past 35 years we have shared very few views and are frequently polar opposites. But I think love should transcend politics. He uses very different sources than I do for information, and if we can’t agree on a reliable source how do we manage to have a basic understanding of a different viewpoint? But I’ll always love my dad.
I can respect people who vote differently than I do, including in the upcoming election, and I think you, Eric Zorn, could as well. How many people do you know well who are planning to vote for Trump? Do you understand why they are voting that way? Before love and respect there has to be understanding.
There are a lot of reasons why someone might have preferred Trump over Biden (assuming the quote applied when Biden was the presumptive nominee). Some of those reasons are based on good intent. It is also possible that things you find repulsive about Trump find a shared sentiment with many Trump voters. Have you ever held your nose to vote for someone?
For example, some people think that more trade protectionism will be good for the US economy, and Trump is much more credible than Biden on protectionism (I think he is, but I do not think protectionism is good for the economy or even the people it is intended to help). I know plenty of people who think protectionism is good. I disagree but I never disrespect them due to that issue. I could be wrong, after all.
I convinced my wife, a life-long Dem to vote for Corinne Wood in a Republican primary for IL Governor in 2002 because she was pro-choice. This is the single most important issue to her. All of the Dem candidates were pro-choice and she did not have a strong preference between them. So she voted her issue. Does that make her a traitor to the Democratic Party? Some people think so, but so what?