Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dan P.'s avatar

Here's your big opportunity to rename the Picayune Sentinel as Z.

Expand full comment
Aviva Patt's avatar

Regarding the elimination of cash bail - some people don't seem to understand what has been changed. Suspects can still be held in pre-trial detention if they are deemed to pose a danger to society - same as with cash bail. They can still be held if they are deemed a flight risk - same as with cash bail. The only thing that changed is the inequity of a system in which someone who is NOT deemed to be a danger to society and is NOT deemed to be a flight risk, is still held in pre-trial detention for months or even years because they are poor.

Under the cash bail system, two people accused of the exact same crime, with the same criminal background (or lack thereof) could appear before the same judge and be given the same amount of bail and the one with money to pay would be released pending trial and the one without money would stay in jail. That makes no sense from a public safety point. And since years of studies in various jurisdictions demonstrate that people released without posting bail are just as likely to show up for their trial as those who post bail, cash bail makes no sense from the point of having the defendant show up in court.

And it makes even less sense when considering that a low-level functionary in a street gang or drug-dealing enterprise could have their bail set at $10,000 and not be able to pay while the gang leader or drug kingpin would be able to pay bail of $100,000 or $1,000,000 and walk free to continue running their illegal organization until their trial.

The cash bail system is unjust, inequitable, and ineffective in increasing public safety or compliance with court orders.

Expand full comment
56 more comments...

No posts