That understandable change undermines the idea that there is some magisterial "voice of the paper" and exposes that delusion, doesn't it? I agree with Mr Zorn that it is an outmoded conceit.
That understandable change undermines the idea that there is some magisterial "voice of the paper" and exposes that delusion, doesn't it? I agree with Mr Zorn that it is an outmoded conceit.
That understandable change undermines the idea that there is some magisterial "voice of the paper" and exposes that delusion, doesn't it? I agree with Mr Zorn that it is an outmoded conceit.