Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Monica Metzler's avatar

I cannot agree with you about wanting the author's identifying info at the beginning of guest opinions pieces. We all have personal biases; all of us. I feel it's important that we be aware of them and continually check ours when forming opinions. It's of better value to read a piece first and come to your own conclusion about whether you agree or not with the author's point and how you feel about the argument made. If you then see the author's name and you instantly re-think your view of the piece, THAT is the learning moment. If you know the author in advance, it's impossible to not have that influence your view of what they write.

Years ago it happened to me twice in a week. I read a piece making the case for something I'd never considered; it was a well-made point and well-crafted argument and I found myself agreeing. I don't even remember the issue and was shocked to see the author was Rahm Emanel who I had *very* strong opinions about and would absolutely not have read if I'd known he was the author. Then I read a piece I thought was completely wrong with a flimsy, uninformed, and poorly-made argument only to find it was written by someone I thought highly of and really admired. That was eye-opening to say the least. That is how you spot your biases. So leaving names at the end is, I think, a pretty easy way to exercise critical thinking skills at a time when everyone chooses to get their news & views from only those they already agree with.

Expand full comment
Deni's avatar

Hell, I love watching Caitlin Clark play, and I don't even LIKE basketball.

Expand full comment
58 more comments...

No posts